John Black and Associates
  • About Us
    • JBA Team
    • History
    • Blog
    • Press
  • Our Services
    • Healthcare Transformation
    • Tours
    • 3P Lean Design
    • Mistake Proofing Webinar
  • Clients
    • Results
  • Books
    • Articles
  • Contact Us

Healthcare Needs a Vision

2/17/2017

 
​Some of the most brilliant minds and compassionate people go into healthcare. So why do we still see over 440,000 preventable hospital deaths every year? Question: do most healthcare leaders have a vision for their organization’s future? And have they “operationalized” it, as Dr. W Deming would say?
 
Vision separates “good enough” from “excellent.” Vision gives inspiration when the job gets tough. Vision makes the impossible, possible.
 
History shows this pattern: Vision comes first. Success follows.
 
In his research on the power of vision, Joel Barker came across a Dutch scholar’s work on successful civilizations. In Barker’s words, the scholar found this sequence of events, over and over: “First a compelling vison of the future was offered by leaders. Then that image was shared with their community and [the community] agreed to support it. Then, together acting in consort, they made the vision a reality.”
 
Today we see the same thing happening. Watch this video, about the difference between Detroit after it began to deteriorate in the late 20th century and Hiroshima, which was totally destroyed in 1945 and has been completely restored today.
​Hiroshima emerged from tragedy because its leaders promoted a positive, forward looking vision for the city. As the auto industry declined, American leaders abandoned Detroit’s future and its decay followed.
 
Lean gives us the tools to start setting our visions for healthcare. Imagine a future with zero wasted medicine, zero wasted steps to and from supplies. A future where doctors and nurses are able to spend more time with patients and less time on logistics. A future where healthcare is both financially solvent for healthcare facilities and affordable for the patient.
 
We need leaders to present the bold visions that lead to huge transformations. Change happens step by step, and commitment to the goal falters without clear inspiration. Healthcare needs a vision.
 
This isn’t fiction—lack of vision affects healthcare around the world today. Consider the recent cutbacks by the NHS in England.
“An NHS body has suspended all hip replacements, cataract operations and other non-urgent surgeries for more than two months in an attempt to save more than £3 million…[the policy] will put about 1,700 people at risk of their condition worsening and leave many in pain.
​

​Here’s the reaction from a U.K doctor about the rollback, and it’s spot on: “The CCG is trying to make short-term savings, which may have major consequences for patients. While patients wait for treatment, their conditions could deteriorate, sometimes making treatment more complex and costly. In addition, standing down surgeons and their teams is inefficient and a waste of scarce resources.”
 
Instead of doing the work to use their resources more efficiently, the NHS is making cheap cuts to their system, harming patients and employees.
 
So what would a positive vision for healthcare look like? I want to point you to the work of Atul Gawande, M.D., best-selling author of The Checklist Manifesto, Better, and Complications.
Gawande lays out the only sustainable vision for healthcare I’ve seen to date:
“We have a thirty-billion-dollar-a-year National Institutes of Health, which has been a remarkable powerhouse of medical discoveries.  But we have no National Institute of Health Systems Innovation alongside it studying how best to incorporate these discoveries into daily practice---no NTSB equivalent swooping in to study failures the way crash investigators do, no Boeing mapping out the checklists, no agency tracking the month-to-month results.”
​

Our healthcare system has a good product; our doctors and nurses on the front line deliver the best care with the best medical technology available. But systemic waste gets in the way of their jobs. Healthcare leaders have got to invest in operations that streamline the care process with the priority of eliminating preventable deaths and mistakes with no compromise.
Picture

Listening to the Frontline

11/11/2016

 
In addressing change, leaders have to decide which model they will follow: conflict in which two camps draw battle lines around functional silos; crises in which angry tension exists between functional leaders, doctors, nurses, staff and others; coexistence in which all parties decide not to address differences, to sweep them under the rug and maintain the status quo; collaboration in which everyone agrees to work together to create an organization without waste; cooperation, which is the most positive, where total commitment and openness to the welfare of the people and the organization is seen as paramount to the effort to create an organization without waste.
 
In healthcare, leaders often choose models that do not serve the best interests of their patients and create environments that stymie innovation.
Picture
While wartime often sparks technological advances, past military leaders have sometimes blocked the implementation of innovation.
For example, head physicians in the U.S. military during WWII chose to ignore their colleagues’ calls from the frontlines to transition from plasma-only to whole blood transfusions. War is hell. It’s not easy to lead during a war. But had the management culture been more receptive to continuous improvement, battlefield physicians wouldn’t have had to fight so hard to implement life-saving technology.
 
There were several factors that contributed to the use of plasma rather than whole blood for transfusions at the outset of WWII. In the North Africa campaign there was no such thing as a blood bank where whole blood could be refrigerated and stored until it was needed. Then, no one had developed the means to send refrigerated blood to the battlefronts where it was needed. Lastly, physicians believed that plasma was better than whole blood.
 
However, as the war progressed it became clearer to frontline physicians and surgeons that there was a better outcome for severely wounded patients when whole blood was used. In this case the change agent was a physician, Colonel Edward D. Churchill, surgical consultant to the U.S. Army in the Mediterranean theater. The Colonel presented a new medical concept for the treatment of hemorrhage and shock: whole blood.
 
He started lobbying for change and hit several brick walls. He was swimming upstream against a long held notion that plasma was better, contrary to the evidence from battlefield physicians and surgeons. He quickly realized change could not come from within the military system. Even after a U.S. Navy Surgeon (Lieutenant Henry S. Blake) invented a special box to hold and transport refrigerated containers of blood, the Navy’s Surgeon General didn’t think it was that great an idea and refused to have the box used regularly in navy medicine.
 
Blake didn’t give up on his invention, and Churchill took the case for military use of whole blood to the New York Times. The Times wrote an article on August 26, 1943 titled, “Plasma Alone Not Sufficient.” The American public was upset when they read the article, fearful for the lives of its sons at the front. Finally, the U.S. Army Surgeon General felt pressured enough to quickly accept whole blood for Army use on the battlefield.
 
Look, I’ve seen firsthand how well the medical system works and how thousands of soldiers lived because of the expert care and miracles performed by surgeons, physicians and nurses on the battlefield. During my second tour in Vietnam, I was medevac’d back to the states. I was loaded on a string of medevac’d flights starting in Saigon, from Saigon to Guam, overnight then to Hickam Field, Hawaii, five hours parked in the heat on the tarmac because we were all infected, then to San Francisco, VA Medical Center, overnight, then to Madigan General in Tacoma, WA, and hospitalized for 30 days.
Picture
Three U.S. infantry captains crossing the Mekong in 1967. I'm on the right.
I know medicine’s ability to save lives. That’s not the issue. The issue in healthcare today is the same as it was in WWII: creating management cultures that support innovations in care delivery from the frontlines, the doctors and nurses on the floor, saving patients’ lives in our hospitals every day.
    Picture

    About the author
    ​

    John Black, President and CEO of JBA, has implemented Lean improvements for four decades, first with the Boeing Company and later as a leading consultant in the healthcare industry.


      Get monthly blog updates in your inbox

    Subscribe

    Categories

    All
    Human Potential
    Innovation
    Lean History
    Lean Leaders
    Organizational Design
    Patient Focus
    Process
    Vietnam
    World-class
    Zero Defects


    Archives

    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016

    RSS Feed

©2015 John Black and Associates